Julia Kuehn in her article “Marie Corelli’s Feminine Sublime and the Aesthetic of the Dream”, in a popular context re-evaluate the work of Marie Corelli (1855-1924), the first English bestselling author of the one-volume novel. This article is concerned with what can be called the aesthetic dimension of Corelli’s work. More precisely, the aim is to formulate a rhetoric that describes the narrative strategies of Corelli’s texts. Until now critics have discussed Corelli in a socio-historical context, but have dismissed her novels as popular fiction not worthy of critical analysis (Kuehn, 2008). Consequently, sustained readings of her works are still rare. In fact, in recent years only two critics, namely Rita Felski and Annette Federico, have favored Corelli’s work with close textual analysis (Kuehn, 2008). They explore the author’s appeal through aspects of narrative and not through, for example, the changes in the publishing and library systems.
In contrast, Kuehn (2008) reassesses a representative selection of Corelli’s fictional works, her theoretical and critical writings and her correspondence. Overall, the study aims at understanding the aesthetic of the popular by reading along the lines of three themes. Analyzing a selection of Corelli’s works in the contexts of poetics, romance and religion, it tests out different theoretical models for understanding popular literature. These include genre theory, theories of the sublime, Frankfurt School theories of the mass market, gender theory, Freudian dream theory and selected contemporary psychoanalytical models (Kuehn, 2008). The author develops out of Rita Felski’s analysis of Corelli as a writer of the popular sublime, and subsequently draws upon a variety of other critical readings of the popular and the sublime. Popular culture is, as Felski argues in her essay “God, Love and the Orient,” characterized by an exploration of borders in a utopian gesturing toward a transcendent, exalted, and ineffable sphere beyond the constraints of a mundane material reality, and the location of meaning elsewhere (Kuehn, 2008). Corelli’s contemporary reviewers addressed her attempt to conquer an ordinary reality through “romances” and “dreams” (Kuehn, 2008). The author states that Felski considers this longing as an instance of the sublime, which she redefine in general terms as the aspiration of the human mind toward the silliness which invoke a sense of rapture, transport, or self-transcendence that is linked to a perception of the ineffable and other-worldly.
The introduction argues that Corelli instinctively develops a feminine sublime as a subset of the popular sublime in her novels. It can be understood as a diverse reading of experience characterized by the wish to merge with the sublime object of rapture rather than dominate it by reason. The feminine sublime creates a non-rational rhetoric, which signals the subject’s failure to communicate experience through reason. It finds expression in the romance genre, which is characterized by a yearning for the metaphysical and a mode of excess. Three individual chapters interpret the three main signifiers of Corelli’s feminine sublime: Aesthetics, Love and Religion, and analyze how Corelli manipulates these transcendental themes for a populist context. A subsidiary theme of this article is the proto-modernist elements of Corelli’s work. Throughout the argument surprising convergences between Corelli’s turn-of-the-century populism and the modernist movement emerge.
Reference
Kuehn, J. (2008). The Strategies of the Popular Novel: Marie Corelli’s Feminine Sublime and the Aesthetic of the Dream. The Journal of Popular Culture Volume 41, issue 6, p. 975- 993. Retrieved June 9, 2009 from www.journal.ohiolink.edu
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Response to Melita’s “Marie Corelli’s Feminine Sublime and the Aesthetic of the Dream” Journal Article Blog.
ReplyDeleteMelita,
Interesting article choice! I love re-evaluations of literary works of times past. As the timeframe of Marie Corelli’s one volume novel concurs with my grandparent’s generation, it seems as the author’s views and ideas were right on line with the 19th amendment. Achieving a kind of feminine transcendent equates to not provoking desire, and by renouncing claims to bias.
Based upon the romance genre, I recall reading a few “Harlequin Romance” novels in my younger years. Literature definitely provides insight into the characterization of women. It seems that the unexamined assumptions from the author’s era evolve around femininity and sexual differences.
I definitely agree with you in that Corelli’s views and ideas materialize with modernistic movements – with women’s right to vote, to inherit property, earn an income, own homes –everything we are and have today, as women, created the visual of the dream.
~ Jo
It's important to know that everyone, does have a different writing style. So we have to be appreciative of each person's effort. Despite the savage attacks against Corelli's contributions, she still made sales records. Although many had a problem with her work, she was the only author invited when Edward VII was crowned, and among the invitees she sat with was Mark Twain. She just liked to be imaginative, philosophical and mystical in her writings. It just sad that she could not have been appreciated for her work. She probably thought she could change the world through her work.
ReplyDeleteMelita,
ReplyDeleteGreat article choice! I think you did a wonderful job. I agree with a lot of what you said in your paper. Things have definately changed since the time of that article. Each person has their own opinions about things and should not be critized for it.
Melita, This was an interesting article. I also agree that every individual has a different writing style. Good work.
ReplyDeleteMelita,
ReplyDeleteI find it interesting that works can be interpreted in so many ways. I think that by evaluating other opinions on them, one can come up with their own interpretation as well. I think your article was interesting and you did a great job of analyzing it.
-Kimberly V
Melita, good review of the article and Corelli's work. Question, how do you feel her works fit into today's society? Does her style, be it a bit aged now, work today as it did then?
ReplyDeleteMelita,
ReplyDeleteWow, a very well-written critique. while Corelli had a unique style of writing which could be controversial, I am curious as to why so few have critiqued her writing?
Again I must say you have a very nice writing style.
Melita, nice work. I have never heard of Corelli before now. With all her variety of works, it seems people either loved her or hated her. She wrote about interesting sugjects that were probably taboo for the time but good to see women making a mark in history.
ReplyDeleteHello Melita,
ReplyDeleteWell written analysis, I am not familiar with the writings of Corelli but your anaylsis was interesting. It seems as if she accomplished a lot for women during the time that she lived.
Not sure what happened to my post from June 13, 2009 right of Jo's, but I'll try this again.
ReplyDeleteCorelli, for her time seems like a woman of great strength to write what she did. She seem very controversial. I think she had so few critiques because she was a woman and many did not feel she was worthy of one. We've come a long way.